Battery Rule

In every social gatherings and institution, ethics and moral regarding wizards thoughts, doings and verbal expression should constantly observed to avoid any chastely and physically damaging results from an inappropriate engagement of certain individuals. For social institutions and gatherings involving leave formula, every individual especially those with superior causalityity must cautiously observe the state ethical principle.Take for example the case that occurred in the Betts Lincoln-Mercury dealer Company involving the physical damage incurred by an employee resulting from the inappropriate horse compete of the death chair during an office fellowship. The sequel of the event at the office party led to the legal pursuit of Caudle, the employee, suing the pre casent of the company for his inappropriate action leading to effective nervous damages to the former.However, the president countered by expression that the action was part of the horseplay of the entire group during the party and that he had non intended to hurt anyone specifically the plaintiff. In the aspect of ruling for this case, one must actually and critically consider the event scenario and the ethical aspect of it. It is not clearly indicated in the case whether Caudle is involve in the collective term of the group that go intod in the horseplay during the office party thus this author will consider him to be excluded.Because of which, this author argues that the plaintiff did not participate from the horse playing thus it is very much inappropriate for the president who is manifold to play the said trick on him. Another strain is that, it is a known fact that the electric auto condenser that is involved in the incident posts a risk of shock for anyone who holds it.Because of which, playing with the said item on a very vital nervous describe mainly the back of the head right below the temporal of the idea and posterior of the spinal cord is very much inappropriate since i t suffer lead to serious nervous damages. Because of the said arguments and reasons, this author strongly rules with the side of plaintiff wherein president Betts so committed an action that led to serious nervous damages though without any grave intentions. His must indeed be responsible for his actions and thus must compensate the victims for the reported damages and complications.